still working out all the kinks of this, but this would be something
that is part of a larger enclosure that is secured to a particular
vendor's pedestal
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I need to refer to the math of these in laying out some panels, so best
to just parameterize it in case I fiddle with stuff in the future
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
the inner wall piece being the *whole* inner wall of the frame side
meant that the (now relatively thin) outer wall piece was not supported
by anything on the top and bottom, which combined with the already weak
piece because of the window, gave the edges a lot of give.
shrinking the inner wall piece slightly retains some of the material on
the outer piece, which should friction fit the top and bottom with both
the inner wall piece, and with the panels, leading to a lot more clamp
when everything is secured.
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
this was done for a probably-abandoned attempt at something, but the
parameterization is good anyway
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
could these be broken up? yes. but this .scad was never used AFAIK, so
I'm just going to repurpose it
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I think the lack of symmetry led to a varying amount of force being
applied when joined with the interconnect. take for instance:
OUTER INTER INNER
INTER INTER INTER
INNER INTER OUTER
if OUTER (the "windowed" piece, the outside wall + one half of the
mounting column) is on top on the left side and on the bottom on the
right side, and INNER (the inner wall, the one that floats around
relative to the outer wall) vice versa on the other side, the two pieces
side by side would not create a clean line --- left would be ~0.5mm
lower than the right.
if there was a way to clamp these down relative to each other, the
problem might go away, but these are pretty pivotal to the overall stick
being aligned and the panels don't cross the interconnect, so probably
panels and a completed stick would have been similarly misaligned.
this, I believe, fixes it, and also fixes a tiny issue where a bit too
much material was being cut out of the inner walls by way of the mount
columns having a triangular point not normally seen because it's inside
the inner wall
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
no particular reference for this, just took some "slashes" and cut them
out of the walls with the expectation of using the inner wall in a
different color. designed, as much as I'd call it a design, for the Eva
stick, but this is mostly just me trying stuff at the moment
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
essentially, the whole inner wall and part of the outer wall gets cut
out of the piece, and a new inner wall piece (probably printed in a
different color, or with some design of its own) created that can be
seen through the outer wall's window
multiple window and inner options are possible, this is just the start
while I do other organization
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I'm going to move all of the .scad files into subdirectories and I
couldn't figure out how to recurse properly in make, so... do it the
easy way
make is hard, let's go shopping
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
box pieces having a 45 degree cut for the corners looks very nice, and
works well, but the cut interferes with the extended piece options, so
this reuses the pieces to take ones with the 45 degree lip cut off,
which would be combined with the flush extended pieces, much like how
things used to work for these pieces before I made the box pieces use
said cut.
this also commits a demo of combining everything extended-style
phew
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I'm going to need to duplicate and edit the top/bottom pieces in
order to create better extended pieces, so this moves them into
something explicitly-named. next commit will fix the extended pieces
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
