squeezing 6 in made the structure pretty stringy and unsatisfying to
handle, this should be better
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
seems more coherent, and fits with the newer sega 2P eleven layout I
made, even if I'm going to end up sticking with nine in my builds
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
now that the dir_arc plate is a separate piece, as it should be, we
don't need to duplicate it here.
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I realized pretty late in the build here that I didn't have a way to
access the Fn switch, so I'm just going to try putting it away at the
top back for now
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
Q2009-specific for now, though maybe one day I'll use the cluster on a
frame wall, in which case I'd move this to the "core" collection of
parts
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
this was necessary for the back bottom pieces, so might as well simplify the
print of the front bottom pieces as well
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
these pieces are largely not used for anything, but the left/right have
mounting holes for securing the whole enclosure to the base, and
finishing the connection to where the monitor is mounted
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
the idea of this is to have Select, Home, and Start buttons accessible
via this panel away from the action panels, and the action pannels have
the L3, TP, and R3 buttons in the Sega 2P 11 layout, and then there is
no need for buttons on the back of the q2009 enclosure. I don't think
this would get used for any reason other than q2009 so it lives there.
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
there's a decorative plate angled plate that includes the sega 2P + 1
buttons and dir_arc + W buttons as separate pieces in the same model.
this is a historical artifact that I will fix at some point, but for now
at least, here is the dir_arc + W split out
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
this allows for the traditional 8 buttons plus L3, R3, and TP, all on
one hand. I'm going to use this for the q2009 stuff, especially, but it
might be an interesting option for all arcade sticks
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
still working out all the kinks of this, but this would be something
that is part of a larger enclosure that is secured to a particular
vendor's pedestal
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I need to refer to the math of these in laying out some panels, so best
to just parameterize it in case I fiddle with stuff in the future
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
the inner wall piece being the *whole* inner wall of the frame side
meant that the (now relatively thin) outer wall piece was not supported
by anything on the top and bottom, which combined with the already weak
piece because of the window, gave the edges a lot of give.
shrinking the inner wall piece slightly retains some of the material on
the outer piece, which should friction fit the top and bottom with both
the inner wall piece, and with the panels, leading to a lot more clamp
when everything is secured.
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
this was done for a probably-abandoned attempt at something, but the
parameterization is good anyway
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
could these be broken up? yes. but this .scad was never used AFAIK, so
I'm just going to repurpose it
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
I think the lack of symmetry led to a varying amount of force being
applied when joined with the interconnect. take for instance:
OUTER INTER INNER
INTER INTER INTER
INNER INTER OUTER
if OUTER (the "windowed" piece, the outside wall + one half of the
mounting column) is on top on the left side and on the bottom on the
right side, and INNER (the inner wall, the one that floats around
relative to the outer wall) vice versa on the other side, the two pieces
side by side would not create a clean line --- left would be ~0.5mm
lower than the right.
if there was a way to clamp these down relative to each other, the
problem might go away, but these are pretty pivotal to the overall stick
being aligned and the panels don't cross the interconnect, so probably
panels and a completed stick would have been similarly misaligned.
this, I believe, fixes it, and also fixes a tiny issue where a bit too
much material was being cut out of the inner walls by way of the mount
columns having a triangular point not normally seen because it's inside
the inner wall
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
