2024-03-16 11:28:25 -05:00
|
|
|
# Printing and Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bss's random thoughts and notes on the actual printing of the Buildable Stick System.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Printing Settings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My preferred settings are 3 wall loops with 20% gyroid sparse infill. This gives the models a bit more weight and
|
|
|
|
strength against bowing forces, but something more default, like 2 wall loops, 15% grid sparse infill, is fine and does
|
|
|
|
not lead to a weak enclosure.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-13 23:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
### Supports and Positioning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the parts are designed to be printed outside-face-down. The bevels are at an angle (45 degrees) that should print
|
|
|
|
fine with no supports. Make sure everything is aligned properly on your plate so that the flat face you will look at the
|
|
|
|
most is on the bottom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The only exception to this is the interconnect piece(s), which are not visible and need a support to print. Maybe one
|
|
|
|
day I'll rejigger these.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-16 11:28:25 -05:00
|
|
|
### Working With Flatness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lot of the pieces are long and flat, so I recommend really dialing in your printer settings. The frame pieces make
|
|
|
|
corner curling of the frame less of a problem, but you may still get it on the panels and the beveled frame pieces.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-18 10:22:13 -05:00
|
|
|
#### Bottom Layer Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Considering the visible layer (usually, the bottom layer) pattern is ideal. Monotonic prints fast but creates long,
|
2024-03-16 11:28:25 -05:00
|
|
|
uniform lines that create reflection patterns on long, flat surfaces. This can be especially distracting for the top
|
2024-03-18 10:22:13 -05:00
|
|
|
panels and their decorative plates, since they're what you're looking at 90% of the time, and the holes break up a
|
|
|
|
perfect pattern, making the long lines stand out even more.
|
|
|
|
|
2024-07-13 23:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
Some specific parts are worth some additional notes:
|
|
|
|
|
2024-03-18 10:22:13 -05:00
|
|
|
* **Top panels:** using a non-uniform pattern reduces if not eliminates the problem of the surface catching the light,
|
2024-07-13 23:41:12 -05:00
|
|
|
but for some patterns, it may come at the expense of time.
|
|
|
|
* **Avoid:** monotonic.
|
|
|
|
* **Good for the time:** Archimedean chords create the look of a circular ripple radiating out the center, and
|
|
|
|
depending on the material, you may not even notice it much, so it's a pretty good look/speed balance.
|
|
|
|
* **Great if you can wait:** hilbert curve leaves no discernable pattern on most materials, but some high gloss,
|
|
|
|
high contrast materials may show the winding pattern at some angles --- consider Archimedean chords for these.
|
|
|
|
* **Circle-centric decorative plates:** simple ones could be fine in whatever, but the ones for action buttons end up
|
|
|
|
having lots of weird interaction points.
|
|
|
|
* **Avoid:** none; monotonic doesn't look *good*, but the plates don't have enough surface area for the pattern to
|
|
|
|
stand out too much.
|
|
|
|
* **Decent:** concentric is generally good, but you can get some pitting when the pattern radiating away from
|
|
|
|
buttons collides with other patterns, because none of the geometry lines up well.
|
|
|
|
* **Great:** Archimedean chords, just crank up the infill/wall overlap to avoid pits on the edges.
|
|
|
|
* **Frame walls with Neutrik or aux button cutouts:** a reduced but similar problem with the action button decorative
|
|
|
|
plates, the circles near each other create weird interactions with the walls.
|
|
|
|
* **Avoid:** concentric, again, has problems with pitting where geometries clash.
|
|
|
|
* **Decent:** monotonic is pretty decent here, and you probably won't look at the sides too much, so maybe it
|
|
|
|
doesn't bother you.
|
|
|
|
* **Great:** Archimedean chords again, with the same infill/wall overlap as decorative plates.
|
|
|
|
* **Flush frame walls:** you can pretty much do whatever you like here.
|
|
|
|
* **Great:** concentric produces an interesting pattern and you won't have collision problems in a rectangle.
|
|
|
|
* **Essentially great:** Archimedean chords yet again, you may just not like the pattern as much as the end result
|
|
|
|
of concentric.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Archimedean chord pattern is a good default and prints awesome parts, with the only exception being the top panels,
|
|
|
|
which benefit from using a Hilbert curve initial layer pattern instead, though you may be happy enough with Archimedean
|
|
|
|
chord.
|
2024-03-16 11:28:25 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some notes on PLA brands, usages, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Bambu Lab PLA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* In general, nice texture, but under direct light, you can see a bit of the infill pattern through the walls. Not super
|
|
|
|
distracting, but it's there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### White
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Walls are practically translucent, you can almost always see the infill. 3 wall loops and a varying infill pattern
|
|
|
|
definitely help here.
|
|
|
|
* Looks perfectly good for thin things like the Neutrik plates, decorative pieces, that kind of thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Matte
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* I don't like the texture as much, but they do produce nice non-primary color colorways, and you don't see the infill.
|
|
|
|
* Seems like their plastic treatment leaves some plate residue, so be better about cleaning it or you'll get ghosts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Hatchbox PLA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* **Blue:** very blue. Wife likes it.
|
|
|
|
* **White:** more opaque than the Bambu PLA mentioned above, makes a pretty decent (still slightly translucent) frame.
|