more notes on printing and bottom layer patterns
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8881fc172
commit
16f41fe245
@ -13,11 +13,25 @@ not lead to a weak enclosure.
|
|||||||
A lot of the pieces are long and flat, so I recommend really dialing in your printer settings. The frame pieces make
|
A lot of the pieces are long and flat, so I recommend really dialing in your printer settings. The frame pieces make
|
||||||
corner curling of the frame less of a problem, but you may still get it on the panels and the beveled frame pieces.
|
corner curling of the frame less of a problem, but you may still get it on the panels and the beveled frame pieces.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Another thing to consider, in my experience, is the bottom layer pattern. Monotonic prints fast but creates long,
|
#### Bottom Layer Notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Considering the visible layer (usually, the bottom layer) pattern is ideal. Monotonic prints fast but creates long,
|
||||||
uniform lines that create reflection patterns on long, flat surfaces. This can be especially distracting for the top
|
uniform lines that create reflection patterns on long, flat surfaces. This can be especially distracting for the top
|
||||||
panels, since they're what you're looking at 90% of the time. Using a non-uniform pattern, like hilbert curve,
|
panels and their decorative plates, since they're what you're looking at 90% of the time, and the holes break up a
|
||||||
eliminates this problem, but at the expense of a much longer print --- around an hour longer for an inset panel. Other
|
perfect pattern, making the long lines stand out even more.
|
||||||
patterns may improve beyond monotonic, but hilbert curve seems to be the gold standard.
|
|
||||||
|
* **Top panels:** using a non-uniform pattern reduces if not eliminates the problem of the surface catching the light,
|
||||||
|
but for some patterns, it may come at the expense of time. Other patterns may improve beyond monotonic, but hilbert
|
||||||
|
curve seems to be the gold standard.
|
||||||
|
* **Circle-centric decorative plates:** don't use complex patterns like Archimedean chords on decorative plates, as they
|
||||||
|
seem to have issues with filling curves and you still want to try to maximize contact with walls. Concentric is great
|
||||||
|
here if you dial it in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Panels may have tiny gaps against the circular button cutouts; this is largely not a problem as buttom rims, decorative
|
||||||
|
plates, etc. will cover it up. However, I've had some interesting results with:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Initial layer line width: 0.42mm (down .08mm)
|
||||||
|
* Initial layer height: 0.25mm (up .05mm)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Materials
|
## Materials
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user