use the derived frame piece y dimension to build side

as in previous commit, this simplifies the build of the side frame piece
a bit. notably on this one, the preview of the piece is more performant,
so I'm thinking this is a good move. the object triangle count and
volume are slightly different (not sure why), but the object dimensions
are the same

still didn't get rid of any 2-manifold errors though :(

Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
Brian S. Stephan 2025-03-05 08:30:34 -06:00
parent ef68dbca48
commit 03737e2385
Signed by: bss
GPG Key ID: 3DE06D3180895FCB
2 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -5,18 +5,21 @@
include <parameters.scad>
include <components.scad>
use <frames/complete/left-frame.scad>
use <front-or-back.scad>
module side_frame_piece() {
piece_width = panel_support_width+frame_wall+frame_mount_column_width;
difference() {
// side piece is left/right agnostic
frame();
intersection() {
left_frame();
// include the whole left wall (including mount columns)
translate([-(frame_x/2)+(piece_width/2), 0, 0])
cube([piece_width, frame_piece_y_y, frame_z], center=true);
}
// minus the top and bottom
front_or_back_frame_piece();
rotate([180, 0, 0]) front_or_back_frame_piece();
// and just chop out the rest of the frame
translate([piece_width, 0, 0]) cube([frame_x, frame_y+1, frame_z+1], center=true);
}
}

View File

@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ panel_z = 5;
// some dimensions for frame pieces, useful in doing some intersections and chopping
frame_piece_x_x = frame_x - (frame_wall * 2); // essentially panel_x, yes
frame_piece_y_y = frame_y; // the whole y of the frame, yes
// degree to which the extended frame pieces stick out from the end of the frame
frame_extension_x = 25;