somehow a chain led us down a path where there are no values for
the keys in the chain. if that happens, just abort.
i'm not quite sure how this could happen
the motivation here is doing (foo)++ would match \S+ first, adding
(foo) to the karma database (rather than foo, which is probably what
the user meant)
this eliminates the expensive database hit on every request for a line.
the cache is loaded when the module loads and learning new lines should
add the appropriate word to the list. seemed like a pretty good compromise
this keeps us from having the entire markov chain in memory and
having to do the pickling and so on. in many ways, this is a good
thing.
in one way, this is a bad thing. each line on irc will create a
__start1,__start2 item in the database, which means starting a
chain will be an expensive process. (approx 3 seconds, from irc
logs of 600,000 K lines). following selects run much faster, but
the first one is dog slow. a later commit should hopefully fix this.
this just sends a privmsg to the specified target on the specified
connection. pretty straightforward. also, update the modules that
need it to use it.
more of a moving of the code, actually, it now exists in (an overridden)
_handle_event, so that recursions happen against irc events directly,
rather than an already partially interpreted object.
with this change, modules don't need to implement do() nor do we have a
need for the internal_bus, which was doing an additional walk of the
modules after the irc event was already handled and turned into text. now
the core event handler does the recursion scans.
to support this, we bring back the old replypath trick and use it again,
so we know when to send a privmsg reply and when to return text so that
it may be chained in recursion. this feels old hat by now, but if you
haven't been following along, you should really look at the diff.
that's the meat of the change. the rest is updating modules to use
self.reply() and reimplementing (un)register_handlers where appropriate
if the end of a chain has been reached via __end, but min_size
has not been satisfied, discard the last couple elements in the
chain and try again. use min_search_tries so we don't do this
forever.
Brian S. Stephan