add to the complications of the box frame method in the notes
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
308c21fb61
commit
341f6cfc6a
|
@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ about when/how to use specific parts:
|
|||
* `foo-panel-overhang`s --- these have a tray that fits into a frame with the actual face extending beyond the frame,
|
||||
creating an ice cream sandwich enclosure.
|
||||
* These also yield a bit more space inside the box, for tall levers or whatever.
|
||||
* `frame`s (non-pieces) --- these create the box of the enclosure, as one part. These can be hard to print well
|
||||
(shrinkage forces tend to curl up the corners no matter what you do), but if you don't care about that because you're
|
||||
printing an ice cream sandwich, they are simpler than...
|
||||
* `frame`s (non-pieces) --- these create the box of the enclosure, as one part. These can be hard to print well ---
|
||||
shrinkage forces tend to curl up the corners no matter what you do, and some points need supports --- but if you don't
|
||||
care about that because you're printing an ice cream sandwich, they are simpler than...
|
||||
* `frame-piece`s --- these break up the frame box into four faces, and are held together by friction fit and the hex
|
||||
bolts. This is more stable than you might expect, but it does introduce some variability in the overall sturdiness of
|
||||
the enclosure compared with the frame as one box piece.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue