add to the complications of the box frame method in the notes
Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									308c21fb61
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						341f6cfc6a
					
				@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ about when/how to use specific parts:
 | 
			
		||||
* `foo-panel-overhang`s --- these have a tray that fits into a frame with the actual face extending beyond the frame,
 | 
			
		||||
  creating an ice cream sandwich enclosure.
 | 
			
		||||
    * These also yield a bit more space inside the box, for tall levers or whatever.
 | 
			
		||||
* `frame`s (non-pieces) --- these create the box of the enclosure, as one part. These can be hard to print well
 | 
			
		||||
  (shrinkage forces tend to curl up the corners no matter what you do), but if you don't care about that because you're
 | 
			
		||||
  printing an ice cream sandwich, they are simpler than...
 | 
			
		||||
* `frame`s (non-pieces) --- these create the box of the enclosure, as one part. These can be hard to print well ---
 | 
			
		||||
  shrinkage forces tend to curl up the corners no matter what you do, and some points need supports --- but if you don't
 | 
			
		||||
  care about that because you're printing an ice cream sandwich, they are simpler than...
 | 
			
		||||
* `frame-piece`s --- these break up the frame box into four faces, and are held together by friction fit and the hex
 | 
			
		||||
  bolts. This is more stable than you might expect, but it does introduce some variability in the overall sturdiness of
 | 
			
		||||
  the enclosure compared with the frame as one box piece.
 | 
			
		||||
 | 
			
		||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user