don't recommend fiddling with the initial layer height/width
doesn't seem to be any real gain in changing them, having done more prints with those settings and with stock settings. Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									e7543dceb0
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						0513da125f
					
				@ -27,15 +27,8 @@ perfect pattern, making the long lines stand out even more.
 | 
				
			|||||||
  seem to have issues with filling curves and you still want to try to maximize contact with walls. Concentric is great
 | 
					  seem to have issues with filling curves and you still want to try to maximize contact with walls. Concentric is great
 | 
				
			||||||
  here if you dial it in.
 | 
					  here if you dial it in.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
Panels may have tiny gaps against the circular button cutouts; this is largely not a problem as buttom rims, decorative
 | 
					The concentric pattern is a good default and prints awesome parts, with the only exception being the top panels, which
 | 
				
			||||||
plates, etc. will cover it up. However, I've had some interesting results with:
 | 
					benefit from using a Hilbert curve initial layer pattern instead of concentric.
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
* Initial layer line width: 0.42mm (down .08mm)
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
* Initial layer height: 0.25mm (up .05mm)
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
* Initial layer pattern: concentric
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
These are good defaults and print awesome parts, with the only exception being the top panels, which benefit from using
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
a Hilbert curve initial layer pattern instead of concentric.
 | 
					 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
## Materials
 | 
					## Materials
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
					
 | 
				
			||||||
 | 
				
			|||||||
		Loading…
	
	
			
			x
			
			
		
	
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user