don't recommend fiddling with the initial layer height/width
doesn't seem to be any real gain in changing them, having done more prints with those settings and with stock settings. Signed-off-by: Brian S. Stephan <bss@incorporeal.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e7543dceb0
commit
0513da125f
@ -27,15 +27,8 @@ perfect pattern, making the long lines stand out even more.
|
|||||||
seem to have issues with filling curves and you still want to try to maximize contact with walls. Concentric is great
|
seem to have issues with filling curves and you still want to try to maximize contact with walls. Concentric is great
|
||||||
here if you dial it in.
|
here if you dial it in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Panels may have tiny gaps against the circular button cutouts; this is largely not a problem as buttom rims, decorative
|
The concentric pattern is a good default and prints awesome parts, with the only exception being the top panels, which
|
||||||
plates, etc. will cover it up. However, I've had some interesting results with:
|
benefit from using a Hilbert curve initial layer pattern instead of concentric.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Initial layer line width: 0.42mm (down .08mm)
|
|
||||||
* Initial layer height: 0.25mm (up .05mm)
|
|
||||||
* Initial layer pattern: concentric
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
These are good defaults and print awesome parts, with the only exception being the top panels, which benefit from using
|
|
||||||
a Hilbert curve initial layer pattern instead of concentric.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Materials
|
## Materials
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user