Merge branch 'feature/improve-block-filtering' into 'develop'

activitypub: properly filter out transitive activities concerning blocked users

See merge request pleroma/pleroma!1072
This commit is contained in:
kaniini 2019-04-17 20:12:44 +00:00
commit 8c65b69d4a
2 changed files with 24 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -712,7 +712,7 @@ defp restrict_blocked(query, %{"blocking_user" => %User{info: info}}) do
from(
activity in query,
where: fragment("not (? = ANY(?))", activity.actor, ^blocks),
where: fragment("not (?->'to' \\?| ?)", activity.data, ^blocks),
where: fragment("not (? && ?)", activity.recipients, ^blocks),
where: fragment("not (split_part(?, '/', 3) = ANY(?))", activity.actor, ^domain_blocks)
)
end

View File

@ -341,6 +341,29 @@ test "doesn't return blocked activities" do
assert Enum.member?(activities, activity_one)
end
test "doesn't return transitive interactions concerning blocked users" do
blocker = insert(:user)
blockee = insert(:user)
friend = insert(:user)
{:ok, blocker} = User.block(blocker, blockee)
{:ok, activity_one} = CommonAPI.post(friend, %{"status" => "hey!"})
{:ok, activity_two} = CommonAPI.post(friend, %{"status" => "hey! @#{blockee.nickname}"})
{:ok, activity_three} = CommonAPI.post(blockee, %{"status" => "hey! @#{friend.nickname}"})
{:ok, activity_four} = CommonAPI.post(blockee, %{"status" => "hey! @#{blocker.nickname}"})
activities = ActivityPub.fetch_activities([], %{"blocking_user" => blocker})
assert Enum.member?(activities, activity_one)
refute Enum.member?(activities, activity_two)
refute Enum.member?(activities, activity_three)
refute Enum.member?(activities, activity_four)
end
test "doesn't return muted activities" do
activity_one = insert(:note_activity)
activity_two = insert(:note_activity)